Corsair Neutron GTX 240 GB

Storage

HD Tune Pro

HD Tune Pro

HD Tune Pro

HD Tune Pro

HD Tune Pro’s benchmark results in three scores – read average, read access time and read burst rate. Here we see that the Neutron GTX comes second in the read average behind the venerable M4, second in the access time behind the M5 Pro and third in burst rate – so a decent but not commanding performance. Read speed definitely isn’t the chief advantage of the drive against its top tier competitors, but it’s still respectable.

PCMark 7

PC Mark 7

PCMark 7 crashed a few times during my runs with it (and only once took out the text of this review), and in amongst its overall run includes a hard disk benchmark resulting in a single storage score; a good at-a-glance indicator of comparative performance. Here we see that the M5 Pro takes home the top slot, with the Corsair Neutron GTX coming second. The two drives are definitely very close in performance.

Previous Next

Last modified: September 13, 2012

Previous Story

Storage

Plextor M5 Pro SSD

Windows 8 Install Time Windows 8 takes longer to install than its predecessor, particularly due to its...

Next Story

Storage

Samsung 840 250GB and Samsung 840 Pro 256GB vs. OCZ Agility 3 240GB

Conclusion We find the different drives at the following prices: Samsung 840 250GB goes for €160.-, the...

0 Responses to :
Corsair Neutron GTX 240 GB

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.