Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7

Motherboards

Testing and Results

To test the motherboard I usually present a typical set of benchmarks which have proven their worth over time. Today it’s a bit harder, as initially the motherboard I wanted to compare the UD7 with is the Gigabyte GA-785GMT-UD2H, which easily allows 4-core unlocking, and so I took quad core results. With the core unlocking issue from the UD7 results have gotten a bit messed up and in fact, the UD2H would easily win considering it’s core advantage. Plus to that SiSoft Sandra decided to put throw in the towel just before the deadline of this review. Whenever possible I will update this review, also in regard to the current outstanding issues.

All results are taken with a Phenom II X3 3.80GHz. Memory DDR3-1600 CL6-8-6-20 T1.

AIDA64 Memory

Latency

785GMT: 43.7ns
990FXA: 43.4ns

AIDA64 CPU

Zlib

785GMT: 112.8 MB/s
990FXA: 140.8 MB/s

Cinebench

All results speak for the UD7. Important to note is that on standard HTT the UD2H overclocks to 201 HTT, which gives a typical advantage in benchmarks. Even then, the UD7 runs off with the performance crown. If only it could unlock that CPU…

 

Pricing and Availability

The Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7 is widely available in any country that sells computer hardware. Prices start at around €190.- and range up to €240.-. The UD3 and UD5 siblings come for respectively €115.- and €150.-. The ASUS Crosshair V Formula comes for about €10.- less than the UD7 and is good competition.

Previous Next

Last modified: September 1, 2011

Previous Story

Motherboards

Sapphire Pureblack P67 Hydra

Results   Cinebench Cinebench is a real world benchmarking tool that’s based on the Cinema4d...

Next Story

Motherboards, Reviews

ASUS ROG STRIX X370-F Gaming motherboard review

The ASUS ROG STRIX X370-F is a high-end AM4 motherboard, retailing for close to £200 ($200) and sitting...

7 Responses to :
Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7

  1. zeepkist says:

    7/10 you must be joking.
    Voltage droop issue, Core unlocking issue and expensive.

    on top of that one miserable usb 3.0 controller for the front, same for the back.
    is this a mb for the future?
    well, not for me.

    1. Albert Vogd says:

      Hi Zeepkist,

      I’m not joking at all. In my eyes 7/10 for a flagship motherboard is a bad score. These top-of-the-line motherboards are supposed to take the crown, regardless of their price. In this case the price barely justifies the quality of the motherboard.

      If the motherboard didn’t have the Vdroop and core unlocking issue it would have had a much better score. It’s up to Gigabyte to fix these problems, or at least show that the Vdroop is essential for the upcoming Zambezi.

  2. zeepkist says:

    i would give it 4/10.

    too many usb 2.0 and not enough usb 3.0

    1. WillHemmens says:

      You use USB 3 for what exactly?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.