Gigabyte P35W v2 gaming laptop review


Every year, dozens of new processors and graphics cards are released. It’s an opportunity for hobbyist PC builders to upgrade to new levels of performance, and the same is true for professional laptop makers. Gigabyte are no exception, and they’ve updated their P35 gaming laptop to include the latest Intel processors and Nvidia graphics cards. We’ve got the new P35W v2 in this week, so let’s see how it compares to its predecessor and other gaming laptops on the market.


OS Windows 8.1
CPU 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4710HQ Processor (2.5GHz-3.5GHz)
Display 15.6″ Full HD 1920×1080 Wide Viewing Angle LCD
System Memory 16GB DDRIIIL 1600, 2 slots (2x 8GB)
Chipset Mobile Intel® HM87 Express Chipset
Video Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Storage 2x 128GB mSATA SSD (in RAID 0) + 1TB 2.5″ HDD 7200 RPM
Keyboard Type Full-sized Auto-Adjusting Backlit Keyboard
Optical Drive Super Multi DVD RW
I/O Port USB(3.0)*2, USB(2.0)*2, HDMI, D-sub, RJ45, Mic-in, Earphone-out (SPDIF), SD Card Reader,
DC-in Jack, mini Display Port
Audio 1.5 Watt Speaker*2, Woofer speaker*1, Microphone, Dolby® Digital Plus™ Home Theater
Communications LAN: 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet
Wireless LAN: 802.11ac/b/g/n
Bluetooth: Bluetooth V4.0
Webcam HD Camera
Security Kensington Lock
Battery Li-Polymer, 11.1V, 75.81Wh
Dimensions 385(W) x 270(D) x 20.9(H) mm
Weight ~2.16kg (w/Li-polymer battery)
~2.26kg (w/ODD and Li-polymer battery)

Specs given are for the review unit received; different configurations are available depending on region and retailer. Operating system, CPU, RAM, display, storage and optical disk drive can all be changed. CPU can be 4700HQ or 4710HQ. RAM can be 4, 8 or 16GB. Display is fixed at 1080p and 15.6″, but ‘wide viewing angle’ and regular options are available. Storage options include up to 4 drives, including multiple solid state drives. The optical disk drive can be upgraded to a Blu-ray writer.

Differences from last-gen P35K

The changes from the P35K are fairly self-evident and mainly limited to CPU and GPU. A higher-spec 4th generation Intel processor is used, with frequency climbing from 2.4 to 2.5GHz, while the GPU change is more substantive: a GTX 765M with 2GB RAM is exchanged for a GTX 870M with 6 GB RAM. A mini-DisplayPort has also been added. Otherwise, the two machines are near-identical in terms of looks, dimensions, weight, ports and internals.

For this reason, this review will examine these hardware changes only; for a more general review of the machine’s packaging, physical features and usability, please read the original Gigabyte P35K review.

Testing Methodology

In order to best examine the difference in performance from one generation to the next, we’ll be keeping a similar testing methodology that we used on the initial P35K. That means playing games like Counter-Strike GO, Battlefield 4 and StarCraft II. Additional tests will also be performed in Diablo III: Reaper of Souls and Heroes of the Storm, alongside traditional benchmark games Company of Heroes 2 and Metro: Last Light.

Our results will therefore be split into two parts, encompassing first-hand impressions of playing games on the laptop and synthetic measures of the laptop’s performance in benchmarks (including 3DMark, Cinebench, CrystalDiskMark and GeekBench).

Testing Results

Blizzard games like Heroes of the Storm, StarCraft II and Diablo III all ran well on the Gigabyte P35W v2, reporting frame rates in excess of 120 at medium graphical settings and easily 60 fps on high. More challenging games like Battlefield 4 and Company of Heroes 2 showed more impressive performance, with the improved GPU allowing the games to run smoothly between 40 and 60 fps even during intense multiplayer matches.


The P35W v2 gets very loud while in games, and produces a fair amount of heat as well; it seems its cooling arrangement isn’t sufficiently good to allow for lower RPM settings. The fan noise was variable though; simpler games running at lower graphical settings more much more tolerable. If you’re planning to run graphically demanding games on the laptop, then picking up a good set of headphones might be a good idea.

I also ran into a few audio bugs while testing the laptop, namely that the sound sometimes cut out entirely for no reason. I experienced similar issues on the P25K, and it’s disappointing that these haven’t been fixed in the next model.

These issues aside, the P35W v2 is an impressive gaming performer for the money.

Benchmark Results


3DMark is a popular cross-platform test of graphics and physics, in a manner that approximates a typical game at three different challenge levels. Ice Storm is designed for mobiles / low-end PCs, Cloud Gate is for notebooks / desktop PCs and Fire Strike is for gaming desktops. We’re using the latest x64 version of the benchmark from Steam.

3DMark Ice Storm Cloud Gate Fire Strike
P35W v2  110792  16097  4286
P25W 44699 9896 3228
X7 (SLI) 116534 17586 4171
P27K 58487 12372 2557
P35K 86517 13154 2675
U2442 42430 4463 1147
Aspire S7 34113 3928 548
Aspire V5 32841 3633 474

3DMark also recently added a new fourth benchmark for gaming laptops called Sky Diver. The P35W v2 received a score of 14297 here, which will be included in future tables once I can test another machine on the same test.

The results here are a solid indication that the new P35 is a worthwhile upgrade from its predecessor. The P35W v2 approaches the dual-GPU Aorus X7 in performance, and even beats that notebook in the most demanding Fire Strike benchmark. It’s an impressive result for sure, and a good indicator of the advances that Nvidia have made with their latest generation cards.

Screenshot 2014-07-14 21.46.44


Cinebench is a nice cross-platform benchmark that stresses the CPU and GPU. All results are shown using the discrete graphics processor, if available.

Cinebench R15 OpenGL CPU
P35W v2 103.04 603 cb
P25W 58.18 330 cb
X7 (SLI) 88.42 641 cb
P27K 82.24 560 cb
P35K 82.34 636 cb

Again we see considerably higher results here than even with the Aorus X7’s dual-GPU setup. Frame-rates are about 25% higher compared to the previous generation P35K, while the CPU score is about the same. That suggests that if you’re struggling with CPU-bound games on the P35K, you won’t see a large enough performance increase to justify the upgrade. In contrast, for GPU-bound games (which is most of them), then the 25% increase in OpenGL FPS will likely offer a considerably smoother experience over the P35K.

Screenshot 2014-07-14 21.54.46


CrystalDiskMark is a benchmark that examines disk read and write performance of the solid state drive.

CDM 3 Read Seq 512K 4K 4K QD32
P35W v2 988.8 674.9  29.26  502.5
P25W 505.7 371.6 30.34 312.2
X7 998.6 674.7 28.97 417.1
P27K 474.5 353.8 21.37 312.3
P35K 926.8 679.6 24.55 494.6
U2442 468.0 339.0 21.72 282.6
Aspire S7 793.1 333.0 22.3 193.3
Aspire V5 107.2 35.65 0.417 1.003
CDM 3 Write Seq 512K 4K 4K QD32
P35W v2 627.8 630.1  64.07  481.9
P25W 320.3 322.7 66.48 279.7
X7 631.6 627.3 62.59 375.0
P27K 317.0 320.7 40.10 262.0
P35K 624.2 574.1 56.59 473.7
U2442 177.9 178.2 46.07 150.2
Aspire S7 509.8 229.2 70.39 61.71
Aspire V5 106.7 50.47 0.973 1.147

This benchmark is more of a sanity check than anything else; we’d expect to see similar scores to the other RAID0 machines in our history, like the Aorus X7. And indeed, we do see very similar scores here.

Screenshot 2014-07-14 22.02.25


GeekBench is another cross-platform benchmark that examines memory and processor performance. As previously, I’m using version 3 of the benchmark.

GeekBench 3.1.3 Single-core Multi-core
P35W v2 3186 12262
P25W 1693 6170
X7 3196 12044
P27K 2820 10212
P35K 3233 11993

This is a CPU and memory test, so we’d expect to see similar results given the small bump in specs in the P35W… and true to form, we do see exactly that.

Screenshot 2014-07-14 22.05.08

Metro: Last Light

Metro is a challenging game, both on you and your PC. Its benchmark tool is quite formidable, so let’s take a look at how the X7 performs in an actual game. The settings are Direct X 11 renderer, 1920x1080p, High quality, AF 4X filtering, normal motion blur, no SSAA, DirectX 11 tessellation or PhysX.

Screenshot 2014-07-14 22.17.53

Here we see a slightly better result compared to the P35K – 34 fps compared to 31 fps. This small difference is typical given the CPU-bound nature of Metro: LL.

Company of Heroes 2

Our final benchmark is Company of Heroes 2, an excellent strategy game centred around the Eastern Front of WW2. The game includes a robust worst-case benchmark, so if the game is playable here then you’d expect much better results in actual singleplayer or multiplayer. A large update was recently released, but tests on my main gaming PC don’t seem to indicate any changes in benchmark performance.


An average FPS of 40 was surprising here; that’s the same score I received on my gaming PC. As mentioned before, CoH 2 doesn’t make use of a second GPU, so generally we see the best results from machines with a single good GPU. That fits the P35W v2 quite nicely, and we can see this impressive result because of it.

By comparison, the previous Gigabyte laptops tested recorded scores of 24, 26 and 20 – so 40 FPS is a massive improvement here.


The Gigabyte P35W v2 is a better-than-expected upgrade over the previous generation P35K, offering good gaming performance for around £1200. Thanks to a significant boost to GPU performance and a slight CPU boost as well, the laptop is capable of handling even intense games at its native 1080p resolution and medium to high settings. While some flaws remain from earlier models – including a mediocre keyboard, considerable fan noise and middling battery life – the P35W v2 is a great choice for gamers.


  • Significantly improved gaming performance in GPU-bound titles
  • Small boost to CPU performance
  • Reasonable price to performance ratio for a gaming laptop
  • Generally good design, display and internals retained from P35K


  • Loud and moderately warm under load
  • Mediocre keyboard and battery haven’t seen improvement
  • Some audio bugs persist


  • 9 / 10

3 responses to “Gigabyte P35W v2 gaming laptop review”

  1. Hi, Thank you for the review. Can you please tell me if the housing is plastic or aluminum? Is the screen good enough for Photoshop retouching? Thanks!

    1. The housing is plastic and the screen is good enough for Photoshop retouching, I’d say.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.